I give my characters a sort of out-of-body experience, |
|
Yes, that makes sense - it's surprising how you do see things in a detached way in circumstances like that, and it keeps the narrative nonetheless anchored in one place, by being consistently through one pair of eyes. Or maybe more than one, but making it very clear when you switch so you take your reader with you, and clear that you're in the new person's PoV, not just saying what's happening to them. If you've got an omniscient narrator, on the other hand, there's no reason not to fly over all their heads. But if you want the reader to keep seeing it you probably need to be very clear in your own mind where you, as cameraman, actually are, at any point. Depending on the narrative voice, you can even say 'From the top of the Parliament building the rioters seemed ants...'
Another trick - working in the opposite way but also cinematic - is the part-standing-for-the-whole (there's a proper greek rhetoric word for it which I can never remember). It's quicker to cut-and-paste this from my own work than type out a better example. This is from the narrator-character's single PoV:
"Shirt sleeves and leather aprons and petticoats and Sunday-best pinafores may not easily be counted by company or regiment, but trumpets and drums there were aplenty, and flags, or rather banners, borne aloft in the heat-hazed air with every bit as much pride as that of a colour-sergeant of Guards. I was astounded too to see blood-red, tin caps of liberty bobbing on poles above my head."
Emma
<Added>I think the latter technique might work particularly well as the scene degenerates, and fragments into riot...