Good point from Colin, that dialogue is not speech. It has to feel realistic, but good dialogue really isn’t, because true reported speech would either read like gibberish or be incredibly boring. There was a thread about this a while ago where I said this:
I came home from work on the bus this afternoon and watched (I use the word deliberately) two men in front of me having a conversation. It went something like:
"Are you...er..?"
"Aye... been to... said I have to go for a..."
There was about 10 minutes of this before I got off the bus. The things that struck me were: obviously these two knew what each other was talking about and were filling in the unspoken gaps. Mainly though, I noticed how much was said by body language and facial expressions.
These two factors can be conveyed in written dialogue but there is a terrible danger of it coming across as 'telling' rather than 'showing'. It is much more digestible for the reader if the dialogue is expanded to show the body language and, at the same time, the mood of the speakers. |
|
No one else would know exactly what they were talking about, so this couldn’t be simply transcribed into dialogue. The skill, for us as writers, is to rewrite the conversation so that readers think it’s a genuine conversation.
Dee