After spending part of the day yesterday with two people - both lovely - who mock the use of the split infinitive and, goodness forbid, the difference between different from and different to.
"They're guidelines," I said. [Thanks, Emma] "And can be broken if you know why you are doing so."
"Well, of course they say that nowadays," said one of them.
So, courtesy of Oxford Dictionaries:
Different from, different than, different to:
Some people criticize different than as incorrect but there’s no real justification for this view. There’s little difference in sense between the three expressions, and all of them are used by respected writers. |
|
Split-infinitives:
...there’s no real justification for their objection, which is based on comparisons with the structure of Latin. People have been splitting infinitives for centuries, especially in spoken English, and avoiding a split infinitive can sound clumsy. It can also change the emphasis of what’s being said.
But goes on to say:
As a result, it’s safest to avoid split infinitives in formal writing, unless the alternative wording seems very clumsy or would alter the meaning of your sentence. |
|
How refreshing. I'm sticking with this website.
http://oxforddictionaries.com/words/grammar<Added>Eek, the 'goes on to say' refers to formal writing, the meaning of which I lost in my editing. Sorry.