If you've got an omniscient narrator, they can show/tell you whatever they choose to show/tell you - what Carmelle's thinking, what he's thinking, what the weather's like, what they don't know... and so on. In which case there's nothing fundamentally wrong about this at all.
I wouldn't make a judgement about this until I'd seen a good couple of pages, and seen whether the narrative hops too and fro to abruptly and/or too often - whether the PoV shifts are clumsily handled, in other words.
If this is intended to be limited to Carmelle's PoV then I agree, 'his pulse quickened' is something she can't know: as Jem says, you'd have to convey that to the reader through her perception of it. Having said that, 'her hair brushed his cheek' could be either PoV, and you could argue that she's physically close enough to him to feel the pulses...
For what it's worth, this story set out to be an exercise in handling a point of view which moves between the two main characters. Each is set up with a fairly substantial chunk, and then as they make friends the shifts get more frequent and more significant. But there's no point where the narrator says anything that neither of them could know:
http://www.writewords.org.uk/archive/12696.asp
Emma