Hi, I've only just joined so please excuse my butting in.
Reading dialogue, she reckons, is like watching TV. She also says it's the best way of avoiding too much 'tell'. Dialogue is the easiest way of ensuring 'show' - letting characters speak dircetly to the reader themselves so the reader can form her own impression. |
|
When watching TV, you are seeing the action as well as hearing the dialogue; dialogue alone cannot fulfill all story functions.
I would have said that dialogue can lead to falling into the 'tell' trap and that action is far better for 'show'. How your editor could see it the other way round is puzzling.
all the white bits make it go quicker! |
|
That's very true, but if you're enjoying the book, do you really want it to go quicker? Just a thought!
I must admit I began to find it confusing and tedious reading all that dialogue. It felt like I was reading a screenplay rather than a book.
|
|
I find too much dialogue tedious, too, unless it's Austen. Besides being famously clever and witty, she used it to reveal character more than advance story, I think. If I open a novel randomly and see great swathes of dialogue, I tend to close it again.
Dialogue can do more to hold up a story than advance it, much like a car chase, a sex scene or a battle scene does (to my mind, at any rate!).
Anyway, just my twopennorth. We all have different tastes, of course. I'll duck out again now.