It's the best I can do at the moment, but I also know the experience of writing it will make the next one better. |
|
This is so true, and one reason why it's often worth persevering with something that doesn't seem right yet - you'll learn a lot.
I would also say that many writers find it's
much easier to change the tone later than it is to change the structure. And it's easier to keep a feel for the structure - how the skeleton fits togther, whether the different bits are all the right size and joined together the right way - if you don't get distracted by the detail. I think what I'm saying is that that you can't get all the elements right first go, and the structure should probably take priority, as it were.
Having said that, there's nothing to say you have to keep the tone from now on consistent with what's gone before. You could just let it change, or nudge it towards changing, as it wants to. Or you could even take a break and think out a short story whose demands would push you towards the tone you want. When you've pinned it down - even if you don't bother to polish the story, even if it's just a first draft more like free-writing - you could go on with the novel with that ringing in your ears. By the time you've worked it through to the end, you'll probably know exactly how you need to revise the tone of the early stages to make it match.
Emma
<Added>Crossed with you, Cherys. Novels are long haul, all right. The comfort is that in some ways they're more forgiving...