Login   Sign Up 



 
Random Read




  • # for a
    by Michael_PD at 08:43 on 24 April 2007
    I'm working on the final stages of manuscript preperation, sorting out all the little problems that I told myself I'd sort out "when the time came".

    I was grateful for the thread on underlining for italics, as I used to do that for novel manuscripts.

    But there's another thing I was told to do and I'd like to know if it is still necessary; using "#" to indicate a blank line or gap between paragraphs.

    Does anyone use it? Would agents / publishers expect it? I've not seen any in the work uploaded on this website, so perhaps its another "rule" than does not apply nowerdays? Anyway, best to sure.

    Michael



  • Re: # for a
    by EmmaD at 09:41 on 24 April 2007
    Never heard of that in my life! I wonder if it comes from the typewriter days when you wanted to make it clear that a double-line space was deliberate.

    Emma
  • Re: # for a
    by Michael_PD at 09:47 on 24 April 2007
    Thanks for your reply, Emma.

    It was something I picked up on a corresponding writing course many years ago. Perhaps it is just a throwback to the typewriter days as you say.

    I’ll forget about it (otherwise the agent might think I’d gone berserk on the keyboard).

    Michael
  • Re: # for a
    by Dee at 15:50 on 24 April 2007
    No, I've not heard that either, Michael. Are you confusing it with * ? From reading, and from having my own novel edited, I believe white spaces should be left blank except where they fall so close to the end of a page that the space isn’t obvious. When this happens, most books use a group of three stars ***

    Dee
  • Re: # for a
    by Account Closed at 16:36 on 24 April 2007
    I usually just use a blank line. I think that's clear enough unless you're dealing with the most uptight of agents/publishers.

    JB
  • Re: # for a
    by Michael_PD at 08:16 on 25 April 2007
    Ah yes, Dee, I've heard of the three stars but forgot about them till you mentioned them.
  • Re: # for a
    by EmmaD at 08:36 on 25 April 2007
    But it's true that there is a small issue of your double-line space happening to fall at the bottom of the page. Though of course the next paragraph wouldn't be indented, but if the preceding line is more-or-less full-length then it's not obvious at all. Copy-editors do mark this up on manuscripts for typesetters, tho' I can't remember how, so I suppose if you were really worried a reader would miss it you could use that marking.

    In an actual book proper old-fashioned typesetters would rejig the spacing of four or five pages to stop this happening, but I don't think they bother now.

    Emma
  • Re: # for a
    by debac at 12:05 on 25 April 2007
    Why isn't the first para indented when all the rest are? I only just noticed this and thought it very odd. It seems inconsistent (though if you do it consistently it's consistent within itself).

    I had the problem of a line space near the end of a page when I was sending stuff off to my mentor. It meant the space was not at all clear. I just left it because I wasn't sure what to do. But perhaps I should have used ***.

    Deb
  • Re: # for a
    by EmmaD at 12:20 on 25 April 2007
    I suppose the first para at the beginning or after a break is obviously the beginning of a para, so why waste paper by indenting, whereas with all the others, if the preceding line is longish, it's not.

    I do find when people neither indent in the traditional style, nor leave a space between paras in the online style, the result is horrible, and horribly confusing.

    Emma
  • Re: # for a
    by debac at 12:35 on 25 April 2007
    I guess you're right about there being no need, Emma, but it still seems counter-intuitive to me.

    Until recently I wrote my fiction in what you're describing as "the online style". I hadn't even thought about these things!

    Deb
  • Re: # for a
    by EmmaD at 12:51 on 25 April 2007
    I had to read a whole MS in online-style recently, and it was awful, and did the writing a real disservice, because it made it incredibly hard to keep going with the story, because try as I would, I'm hard-wired to read that double-line space as a real jump in space or time.

    Emma
  • Re: # for a
    by Account Closed at 13:06 on 25 April 2007
    Is *** the standard english method? My mentor is American suggested authors shouldn't give instructions to copy-editors and typesetters in the page. If we want to denote a break, he insists on it being two double line spaces. I have to say, I don't have any problems reading published novels which use that style.

    Juliet
  • Re: # for a
    by EmmaD at 13:45 on 25 April 2007
    My mentor is American suggested authors shouldn't give instructions to copy-editors and typesetters in the page.


    This is certainly true. It only really arises when the MS happens to fall so that it's not clear that there's a big break there, and if you've really got to mark it some way, I guess the copy-editing mark is as good a bet as any.

    Besides, I quite often want an asterisk - centred - for a bigger break than a mere double-line space, but less than a chapter. It would be confusing to use it for something else as well, I guess.

    If we want to denote a break, he insists on it being two double line spaces.


    Presumably as in twice the normal line spacing, whatever that is? I'm so used to double-spaced MS that I tend to forget that technically that's what it is, and would call it a 'double line space' when I do it with two carriage-return, whatever the maths adds up to!

    Emma
  • Re: # for a
    by Dee at 13:56 on 25 April 2007
    I had TWH professionally edited when I was first thinking about self-publishing it, and the editor did style notes for the typesetter. I've just found them, and she specified a blank line space unless the break fell at the end of a page, in which case a symbol should be inserted. She put a note in brackets for me to chose a symbol – so I guess it could be anything. I would recommend something like three stars, though, as you’d want it to be as unobtrusive as possible with disappearing altogether.

    Dee
  • Re: # for a
    by Account Closed at 14:03 on 25 April 2007
    Thanks, Emmas and Dee. That helps!



    Juliet

    <Added>

    Emma :)