I wouldn't go down the road of thinking of chapers as "mini stories". |
|
I agree, Michael. I don't think that's a good way of looking at it.
I do think it's important (and I've only started thinking about this recently) to consider what you want in each chapter, but not as a story on its own - as a component part of the whole.
For instance, if you have several viewpoints and intend to change between them in between chapters then you need to decide what works as that character's "episode" before moving to the next character, and what will juxtapose effectively. If you only have one viewpoint character then you similarly need to decide when you want to break for effect - whether at a cliffhanger or a lull. Perhaps a lull is always wrong - my point is that you need to consider when a break will enhance rather than detract from the experience.
I think a novel written with chapters like short stories would seem just like that, and would not sustain the tension throughout the book. So the joins matter, but
not as if they're individual stories. All IMVHO.
Deb