On the re-reading issue, I re-read masses, but only some things - different kind of reading from reading new things - more like watching telly, but better - my way of relaxing and vegging out - re-read some detective novels, lots of children's stuff and nineteenth century novels - with the latter though I do find that I come across new things every time, or things I had forgotten, because there is so much to them, so never seems to me a waste of time - no more than it would be a waste to listen to a piece of music or look at a picture more than once. |
|
I agree, VM. I re-read only certain books and even those quite rarely, but when I do I often enjoy them even more than I had the first time around. (I suppose it helps that I'm an opera lover; I've grown accustomed to listening to dozens of different recordings of one opera -- and longing to hear more...)
Also, I think it's also a bit like going to see a new production of a play that you like. You evolve, you're no longer the person you were a few years ago, so of course your interpretation of a book is bound to change; and naturally much of the angle of interpretation depends on your current mood and concerns. For example, Austen is one of my most frequently re-read authors (as you can probably guess, from the non-fiction thread!) and it's strange how much the reading experience of, say,
Pride and Prejudice can change in something like two years. Not only do I discover new things in it each time (or things that I've simply forgotten), but the whole
universe of the novel changes, the look & the feel of it; and the 'presence' of the characters, too. There are a dozen different Elizabeth Bennets in my brain... all of them the same character, of course, but all of them different, too -- and I can't quite put my finger on the how or why.