Login   Sign Up 



 




  • I thought this was interesting.
    by rogernmorris at 20:43 on 29 October 2006
    From the blog of an editor at Harper Collins.

    A salutory tale, methinks.
  • Re: I thought this was interesting.
    by EmmaD at 21:30 on 29 October 2006
    Salutary indeed. From what I remember of coming across warning rumbles about this odd affair in the last few weeks, the agent concerned doesn't seem to have been doing it for profit in quite the same way that the big scam operators do in the US (see Miss Snark at the moment). But that's no comfort to the cheated writers.

    Emma
  • Re: I thought this was interesting.
    by rogernmorris at 21:36 on 29 October 2006
    I knew I'd spelled salutary wrong the minute I posted. One of my many word blindness words.
  • Re: I thought this was interesting.
    by EmmaD at 21:57 on 29 October 2006
    I always think it looks a bit odd whichever way you spell it.

    Emma
  • Re: I thought this was interesting.
    by Account Closed at 06:26 on 30 October 2006
    Yes, the Hill Agency's a well known scam. It's on the Preditors & Editors website with great warnings against it, I think!

    A
    xxx
  • Re: I thought this was interesting.
    by Myrtle at 06:58 on 30 October 2006
    The euphoria of thinking major publishers were interested inspired them to write more. Now, they have lost their reason.


    I thought this was the saddest quote from one of the 'victims'. I think most of us would have given up by now if 'major publishers' were our Muse.
  • Re: I thought this was interesting.
    by EmmaD at 09:06 on 30 October 2006
    Alas, we all know that 'major publishers' aren't - mustn't be - the only motivation for writing, but how long you can go on without a publisher of some kind does depend on a) whether you can find other avenues to communicate your work. And b) how long you can go on existing on credit cards and baked beans, specially if you have the guilt of making life harder for others in the family. If I hadn't sold TMOL, I would have had to give up writing in any serious way, until my children were practically and financially independent of me, which is another decade or so.

    Emma
  • Re: I thought this was interesting.
    by smudger at 19:15 on 30 October 2006
    until my children were practically and financially independent of me, which is another decade or so

    Do they know that the clock is ticking?
  • Re: I thought this was interesting.
    by EmmaD at 20:43 on 30 October 2006
    I hope not. I swore when the little blue line appeared that I'd never, ever take the self-satisfied or guilt-trip line of telling them how much I gave up/spent/suffered for them. Fortunately the clock isn't ticking - well, not so quickly - because I did get the deal. If I had had to give up writing because of what they cost me (in all senses) I don't know whether I could have managed another forty or so years of self-restraint on the subject.

    Emma