Login   Sign Up 



 
Random Read




This 30 message thread spans 2 pages:  < <   1  2 > >  
  • Re: unconventional writing formats
    by old friend at 08:52 on 26 February 2004
    Hello Fluffy,

    You may be unconventional - you may even be anti-conventional - but learning the rules is a fundamental. At the same time you will learn how and when those rules may be bent or broken.

    Magazine Editors - particularly of 'specialist' publications - will not be dogmatic in accepting incorrect spelling, poor grammar, correct format etc, provided the contributor knows their subject. The more respected the contributor the more 'mistakes' the Editor will turn a blind eye to... there is always the sub-Editor or the Editor to 'correct'.

    This is not the position in the field of book publishing - nor in other general media.

    You may not aim to have your work published but may I suggest that as a writer there should be a driving force that encourages you to constantly improve your work. This means that everything you write needs to be 'the best' that you can produce... this, as far as I am concerned, includes the comments that one contributes to the WW site.

    Len
  • Re: unconventional writing formats
    by Becca at 09:54 on 26 February 2004
    Far beyond anything else, what matters is that the work is original and interesting, by work I mean the ideas and the way you put them together, rather than any visual effects on the paper itself. You know this of course, already.
    Becca.
  • Re: unconventional writing formats
    by olebut at 10:49 on 26 February 2004
    It seems to me that you can only write in your own style ( allowing for conventions of grammer spelling and punctuation) if you try to write in somebody elses style then you are not you, but a week imitation of them a clone if you like.

    Mills and Boone I believe fairly much dictate how you should write for them fine if you want to turn out book after book which is similar.

    But surely any piece of original work is yours and you use it to stamp your identity and personality upon it anything less is sacrilige.

    If a publisher or agent intimates that you should dramatically change your style for them to publish or accept your work then you must make the decision as to how far you are prepared to go to sell your soul.

    I do agree with Len in principle erors should be removed as far as is humanely possible but correction is one thing changing a style is a totally different kettle of fish.

    take care

    david
  • Re: unconventional writing formats
    by old friend at 13:40 on 28 February 2004
    David,

    I don't think anyone has suggested 'changing a style'. A style is a natural development of the writer's abilities with words, characters and so on. However if anyone attempts to submit work to a Publisher or Agent and that work reflects a writer's lack of care with regard to basics of the English language, then it should not come as a surprise if 'rejection' becomes the usual reaction.

    Len




    <Added>

    Has anyone any experience of being advised by an agent or publisher to 'change his or her style?'
    Len
  • Re: unconventional writing formats
    by Al T at 14:16 on 28 February 2004
Has anyone any experience of being advised by an agent or publisher to 'change his or her style?'

Hi Len,

The short answer is 'yes'. When I first spoke to my former agent about the work I'd initially shown him - which, incidentally, he didn't think was publishable - he pointed out that if I could focus more on particular aspects of that work and write a new book, on the same subject, in a particular genre, then we would both make lots of money.

Needless to say, the genre he suggested wasn't right for me. But I didn't know that until I had spent an awful lot of time trying to write in that vein.

However, having been through that experience, I now have a very strong idea of the kind of book I want to write, and I am indeed writing it now. The style may not be as commercial as the one I was encouraged to work in before, but it's what I'm comfortable with. Moreover, I'm now writing the kind of book that I would like to read myself.

We'll see if I'm right...

Al.

<Added>

Sorry, I meant only to put Len's question in a box, not my entire answer. I'm clearly not enough of a techie for this.
  • Re: unconventional writing formats
    by Dee at 14:30 on 28 February 2004
    Al, I think you should have changed your agent rather than your style – but that’s easy for me to say, not having been in that situation. The problem is, once you’ve got an agent, you cling to them like a liferaft.

    But it sounds as if it wasn’t a totally wasted exercise - so good for you.

    I still support the points about the basics of punctuation, grammar and spelling. Publishers just don’t have the resources these days to groom a manuscript or, for that matter, a new writer. We have to be professional and take the responsibility to present our work in a form they can use.

    Cheers

    Dee.
  • Re: unconventional writing formats
    by Al T at 14:47 on 28 February 2004
    Hi Dee, thanks for your comment. To be fair, though, to my former agent, I should add that I also think that a book on the subject I was writing about, in the genre he suggested, would be a very commercial propositon. I'm just not the right author to produce it. Horses for course, etc.
  • Re: unconventional writing formats
    by old friend at 16:46 on 28 February 2004
    Thank you Al,

    I really don't know what may be involved when one tries to change one's style of writing. I would have thought that the more distinctive one's style becomes then the more difficult it is to change. Of course I understand about changing the genre and of changing the format... but the style?

    A very difficult quality to define in the first place unless it is so distinctive - like that of IB. Now don't get your hackles up IB there's a compliment hidden somewhere in there!

    I wonder if the challenge of writing in a completely new genre might see a noticeable change of style?

    Len
  • Re: unconventional writing formats
    by Dee at 17:03 on 28 February 2004
    Hmmm… this is interesting.

    I’ve already said somewhere – might even be on this thread – that I’ve got four romance novels in various stages. A while ago I decided that no-one was interested in romance and decided to switch to crime.

    I realised that crime writing required a different ‘style’ so, after reading as many books as I could get my hands on, I made a start. I’m now about 60,000 words into it but it’s had to go on the back burner while I concentrate on something else now.

    The point I discovered is, that – while it was clearly a different genre and the writing had more poke than my other novels – it was still my own style. The style remains the same but I’m approaching from different angles.

    Does that make sense? I’m not explaining it very well because I’m not sure I understand it myself…

    Dee
    (wish there was a smiley for bemusedly scratching head…)
  • Re: unconventional writing formats
    by Friday at 17:12 on 28 February 2004
    I feel that ‘Style’ is you. In your bones. Not something you create but something that appears on the page.

    Dawn,
  • Re: unconventional writing formats
    by Becca at 17:51 on 28 February 2004
    I'm with Dawn on this, except to say that your own style developes/matures over time.
    Becca.
  • Re: unconventional writing formats
    by Jumbo at 10:45 on 29 February 2004

    Perhaps we shouldn't confuse 'style' with 'genre'.

    We may have a preferred genre that we like to read - and maybe even write - as in Dee's Romance as opposed to Crime - but I think the way in which we write - our own personal style - will cut across those genres.

    John
  • Re: unconventional writing formats
    by Al T at 13:58 on 29 February 2004
    Hi John, on the question of genre influencing style (or not) take a look at Scarlett Thomas's piece on how chicklit authors are treated:

    http://www.bookgirl.org/chick.htm

    Al
  • Re: unconventional writing formats
    by Becca at 14:23 on 29 February 2004
    Interesting article, Al.
    Becca.
  • Re: unconventional writing formats
    by Jumbo at 17:39 on 29 February 2004
    Yes, Al ....

    Perhaps the article should be compulsory reading for all aspiring authors. It certainly provides an interesting discussion and description on how one section of the publishing industry operates!

    John
  • This 30 message thread spans 2 pages:  < <   1  2 > >