After gorging on five warmed up scones with lashings of jam and mountains of whipped cream made out of
skimmed milk and half the calories of regular whipped cream (a sign that I still care about something, even if it is the size of my thighs)...I am able to write this and say that I feel utterly sick. I should've stopped on the fourth one.
Seriously though, I had a mini-weep, chastised myself in the mirror for being so bloody stupid to let it get to me then ate my scones and lay immobile for an hour in front of t'telly. Vegetation can do wonders at times.
Nell, first of all congratulations on winning first prize in the competition - here's to getting published good and proper, eh!
I know I shouldn't take it personally, and I certainly didn't feel this down on my first rejection (thought of heatherjr and her post), but as I said, had a lot of things on my mind and life etc, etc... It is very frustrating though to receive a standard rejection letter, that gives nothing away because of its generic nature. If an agent/agency didn't read the manuscript - which I suspect the first one I submitted to didn't - then I would prefer to receive a letter saying just that so that I can get over it and move on to the next agent and maybe send the ms to those agents again later down the line once they do have time to read it. What annoys me is that the same sentences of e.g. 'we specialise in commercial fiction and non-fiction tailor made for the mass market and therefore we have to be confident of substantial sales quantitites before taking on a project' or 'having considered your material (when it's clear from how the returned ms looks like it's just come out of my printer that you didn't consider it at all), we do not feel sufficiently enthusiastic or confident about it to believe that we could represent it well on your behalf' are sent out to writers who put their heart and soul into their writing regardless of whether what's written in the letter is true or false.
These agencies I've sent out to and received rejections from are well-established and I would think they could easily afford to hire someone or some two or three to reply to writers not necessarily on an individual basis, that would be unrealistic, but to at least take the time out to reply truthfully and extend the same courtesy to rejected writers as they would to accepted ones.
At least get the name and genre of the ms you're rejecting right...eh, Andrew?
Sorry that you got a rejection also - keep at it (that's what I'm telling myself). You too heather, and all other writers who will inevitably be on the receiving end of rejection - persevere and all that and one day you shall have the last laugh
Anyone for a scone???
Nahed x
P.S. Sorry about the long post...it's out my system now though...promise!