Yeah, I'll dive in and spoil yer day
Only kidding. It was a great review. I always enjoy reading your forum rants and this review carries that same voice. Having said that, the preamble goes on for a bit, but I only say that because I'm interested in a review for this film and I wanted to get to the meat.
I don't know why they do these remakes - it really makes me wonder how pivitol someone mentioning the date as a money spinner at some board meeting was in this film coming about. The only successful horror remake, in my eyes, is The Evil Dead II, which was by same director. Anyway, back to the point, a genuinely fun, but informative review, Waxy, and good to hear it coming from someone who is passionate about the original.
Mind you, one thing I've just got to pull you up on:
an intelligent, understated masterpiece that has, without doubt, stood the test of time. |
|
- I watched the 1976 Omen a few weeks back and although it is still a superb film, I don't believe it's stood the test of time, and I'm with Len on Gregory Peck. He's almost as wooden as John Woodvine in "An American Werewolf in London". But David Warner is fucking class, as is the dude who plays the priest who gets impaled.
Right, I'm all riled up. I'll be watching The Omen when I get back, full of curry and lager
Colin M