Login   Sign Up 



 
Random Read




This 25 message thread spans 2 pages: 1  2  > >  
  • Quantum of Solace
    by Account Closed at 22:51 on 17 November 2008
    Has anyone seen it yet?

    I left the cinema wondering a little over the 5 star reviews, some claiming QoS is 'the best Bond ever'. Ok, it is a good film - not a patch on Casino Royale in my opinion, just an averagely decent fast-paced thriller that doesn't really feel like a Bond film. I can see what the director is trying to do, this reinvention of a post-millenial Bond, but by the end credits, I felt that the film maybe takes itself a little too seriously. Craig is excellent but the film didn't exactly grab me, if I'm honest.

    And the theme tune is dreadful.

    JB

  • Re: Quantum of Solace
    by NMott at 23:12 on 17 November 2008
    Zettel has done a review of it. Saw it the day it came out, and it was an enjoyable evening, but not a particularly memorable one. The close editing of some of the chase scenes really bugged me - much too short.
    And, of course, he's such an ugly dude.


    - NaomiM
  • Re: Quantum of Solace
    by purpletandem at 01:55 on 18 November 2008
    I completely lost the plot. Who are the baddies?
    I think the test of a good piece of art (be it writing, song, dance, visual, whatever) is would you consume it again. I wouldn't watch QOS again, even if free. Sorry.
    dave.
  • Re: Quantum of Solace
    by Jem at 08:52 on 18 November 2008
    Who gave it 5 star reviews? None of the papers I read! Well, you know I hate Bond and would never go to see another one after I sat through the last. And everyone said that one was good, whereas no one has said this one is.
  • Re: Quantum of Solace
    by optimist at 10:26 on 18 November 2008
    Haven't seen it yet

    Sarah
  • Re: Quantum of Solace
    by Account Closed at 13:42 on 18 November 2008
    No gags, no gadjets, no memorable girls - even M seemed wet in this one,to me.

    Yet i adored the theme tune!

    Craig says 'wait for the next film' which apparently gets more on track.

    But this was not a Bond - i mean, since when did 2 Bond films have the same villain and carry on a previous story, what's that all about???

    And worst of all, no swimming trunks;

    x
  • Re: Quantum of Solace
    by NMott at 14:20 on 18 November 2008
    I read in the reviews that M was supposed to have got shot. Uh??? I thought she did, but there was no convalescence scene with her arm in a sling. She must have the constitution of a horse.

  • Re: Quantum of Solace
    by Account Closed at 14:31 on 18 November 2008
    I thought the women were complete drips in this film, Judi Dench included. Very disappointing. Bring back Grace Jones,that's what i say:0

    x
  • Re: Quantum of Solace
    by Kristian at 20:26 on 18 November 2008
    The main problem for me was that there was too much action - by the time the finale came round, it couldn't hope to top what had come before it. Bond seemed to punch, shoot, chase, punch again for twenty minutes before uttering a word.

    Also it was too serious and humourless for me, I don't want a return to the Austin Powers days, but a little shade and light would have been nice - Casino Royale seemed to manage the right balance.

    All that said I still enjoyed it, and found it to be a superior action movie.

    Kris
  • Re: Quantum of Solace
    by Account Closed at 23:40 on 18 November 2008
    M's constant clucking grated overmuch. She is the head of M15 for Q's sake and her chiding Bond over all these 'nasty deaths' etc seemed a bit unrealistic. Then again, the movie did have it's own laughable Bondesque plot devices, didn't it? The oh-so-convenient fall from a crashing aeroplane into the exact sinkhole where Dominic Greene has his evil little reservoir, the hotel built with what basically amounts to a small hydrogen bomb in every room, constructed in the middle of a desert - whose bright idea was that?

    I mean, if you're gunning for credible, at least be credible!

    This one undid much of the expectation conjured by Casino, if I'm honest. I really do think it's all just heading back to the same place.

    Not a bad film, no, but a poor show after the promise of it's predecessor IMHO.

    JB

    <Added>

    And the Goldfinger reference - black gold anyone? - seemed a touch contrived too.
  • Re: Quantum of Solace
    by Account Closed at 09:22 on 19 November 2008
    Hmm, i thought the girl covered in oil was homage to the girl covered in gold all those years ago. A small glimpse of traditional Bond, that scene was.

    There were only two jokes that made me laugh. One was about them being teachers who'd won the lottery and... I can't remember the other.

    I agree though, i wouldn't want to go back to the wink wink, nudge nudge days of Roger Moore.

    x
  • Re: Quantum of Solace
    by optimist at 09:41 on 19 November 2008
    Looks like there is nothing for it - we'll have to write the next one?

    Sarah
  • Re: Quantum of Solace
    by Account Closed at 10:20 on 19 November 2008


    I vote it's time for another one set in outer space. With alien Bond girls. And by now astronauts just wear swimming trunks

    x
  • Re: Quantum of Solace
    by Account Closed at 23:24 on 19 November 2008
    Oh, I don't mean to slam the film, it's just I have no middle ground, or if I do, it's so narrow you couldn't walk it.

    I'm all for outer space. I'd like to see the new Bond films revive Blofeld and SPECTRE. Now that would be something!

    JB

    <Added>

    And I love Alicia Keyes and the White Stripes. Just maybe not together...?

    <Added>

    I do actually have a plot for a Bond movie. Have done for a few years now, but don't think I'd ever get round to writing it!
  • Re: Quantum of Solace
    by optimist at 00:22 on 20 November 2008
    You should

    Think I was 13 the last one I wrote I'd forgotten all about it...

    SPECTRE would be good.

    Sarah
  • This 25 message thread spans 2 pages: 1  2  > >