Alex, I'm afraid I really can't see how these plans are beneficial to writers. Assuming your site fee is more than a few pounds, I don't see how it's buying any real advantage. There are other sites out there that do this already - The Friday Project is involve with one, I think.
- major alternative to sending unsolicited manuscripts with the inevitable rejection |
|
Rejection by the normal route is not inevitable if the work is good enough. If it isn't, no amount of web exposure is going to land representation or a publishing deal.
- knowledge that publishers are viewing their work |
|
Most publishers don't need to go looking for work, and have no time in which to do it. They get more than they can cope with as it is. I can't see that this site would easily have a way of guaranteeing that writers are getting their work looked at. If it hasn't, any fee would be a waste of money.
- superb potential opportunity to get their work published |
|
In what way is this an opportunity, given that legitimate publishers are unlikely to bother visiting?
- has worldwide exposure. |
|
Why is this valuable? Most authors will first be published in their country of origin, given the promotional demands.
- guarantee that all submissions are read and reviewed by a literary agent |
|
In the normal way, authors can get their submissions read by agents anyway. It's called a submission, and only costs paper and postage. To make aspiring writers pay for this service by way of the site fee is extremely unethical. Editorial Assessment agencies are the legitimate way to get a full, paid-for report.
- and for the publishers
- great opportunity to discover new talent online |
|
Talent comes to find them, mostly via agents. There's no shortage of talent coming through their doors as it is, they don't have time to go elsewhere. Most agents and editors hate reading things on-screen anyway, which is why very few of them accept electronic submissions. In publishing, paper still rules.
- major cost and time reduction involved in receiving and replying to both unsolicited and solicited manuscripts |
|
I doubt if the time involved is very different, especially since paper can be read anywhere (and often is - on the way home, in the bath, in bed), whereas a website has to be read at a desk. The costs of returning rejected submissions in an SAE are negligible.
- view manuscripts that are specific to their area/focus away from the traditional submission of unsolicited manuscripts |
|
See above.
- potential to reduce the number of unsolicited manuscripts, especially if the publisher directs the writer to the site in correspondence to the writers |
|
It would be EXTREMELY unethical for a publisher or agent to direct an aspiring writer towards any specific service that costs the writer money, if the implication is that by spending the money, the writer is improving their chances of being published.
The author will be asked to categorise their work and their chapter will be listed within that particular genre, eg Contemporary Womens Fiction. |
|
Many authors actually mis-categorise their work, in which case it's a disadvantage to them to offer them this facility.
The "free to access website" is interactive, allowing users to grade each chapter in a simple way and resulting in a top listing per category. |
|
If I were a publisher or agent I wouldn't be interested in other aspiring authors' ratings of work. Plus, there's evidence from other sites that some authors deliberately rate rival work low, in order to boost theirs up the ratings.
- guarantee that every submission is read and reviewed by a literary expert |
|
What is a 'literary expert' in this context?
- entry into a national author competition, the winner receives a publishing contract |
|
Is the site fee on a par for other novel competitions? i.e. £10 or £20?
- free worldwide acclaimed novel writing software |
|
Presumably site members have already written their novel. For any writer who might find such software useful for their next novel, there are plenty of programs available at less than such a site fee would be.
www.onlyonechapter.com has been designed purely for the benefit of both the author and the publisher. To achieve the desired success, we need your support and feedback on what elements are crucial and beneficial for you. |
|
The site's developers aren't planning on reaping any benefit, then?
www.onlyonechapter.com will be heavily promoted and authors and publishers will be made well aware of the site. We have the commitment from over 15 publishers including Little Brown Book Group, Tindal Street, Maia Press to name but a few, and Hodder Headline, Harper Collins and Virgin have expressed interest. |
|
What form does this commitment take? And who are the other 12 who have made it? Tindal Street and Maia, for example, are absolutely tiny.
Sorry, I don't get it, as you may have realised by now.
Emma