|
|
Tick Tock
Posted: 28 August 2009 Word Count: 175 Summary: A second draft - fairly brutally revised. As ever, any comments whatsoever are much appreciated :)
|
Font Size
|
|
The accursed clock-click time The rightful subject of anarchist hatred The ticking, incessant, constant reminder Of what isn't there and can never be and probably never was
The sound, not as I remember A note or two higher, out of tune A glance that asks Did the second hand really move backwards?
A moment's rage is all that's required To shatter the smallest units of time Supposedly needed to keep us alive
If we swept up the fragments Sent them off to the lab They would know Their processes would tell them, tell everyone And then we'd all have to live by it or be damned
They'd count seconds that were once hours Drifting through their fingers Grains of sand through an hourglass The sundial that should mark days Lies broken in the shade Of so much piss-stained Saturday-night glass
We're never told the truth: Our days are counted in heartbeats A finite number, trickling down to zero The reason athletes age so fast
A man measured in years A butterfly weeks A fly, days
Comments by other Members
| |
paul53 [for I am he] at 10:31 on 05 September 2009
Report this post
|
Hi Andy,
What we have here is a good first draft; the end result of creatively considering one of life's universal bugbears: us versus the ticking away of our alloted time.
All the ingredients are assembled; all the various thoughts; all the angles viewed.
Now comes the hard part: reducing it to a piece where every observation is perceptive and the whole written as concisely [tightly] as possible.
Which bit is unnecessary? Is any bit a repetition of something already said?
Which bit is weaker than the rest? Where does it stumble when I read it out loud?
Where does it make me itch?
There are the making of a fine final piece in here, and the subject will automatically chime with most readers.
Start by reducing it. An example [and feel free to ignore it as you must make it your own]:
This has happened before -
Different last time, and
Different next time;
I know that now |
|
is more concise and [hopefully] says the same thing.
"The sense that" is unnecessary as expressing the sense shows you have sensed it.
Hope some of this is of benefit to you.
Paul
| |
itcametomeinadream at 10:59 on 05 September 2009
Report this post
|
Paul, i'm very grateful for the comment, which is very constructive. It's all too easy to write something and then abandon it, and you're right - avoiding that is the hard part.
Based on your comment, I can already see various lines that are superfluous, and I will have a stab this evening.
Thanks again,
Andy
| |
itcametomeinadream at 21:42 on 05 September 2009
Report this post
|
I did my best to revise this piece. I should probably re-read Twain's brutal deconstruction of Fenimore Cooper ;
For me, there are three parallel themes here. The first is as Paul says - the universal ticking away of our days. The second is the use of time as a mechanism to dictate how it is spent, hence the hat tip to George Woodcock in the first verse. The third is my personal sense of dread at a forthcoming event that I am unable to escape. It's the latter that suffered most with my revision, as it seemed too personal to convey anything meaningfu, and was, in any case, poorly expressed.
| |
V`yonne at 16:13 on 06 September 2009
Report this post
|
I liked this very much. I particularly like the ending - very strong and to the point and the the way the structure of the piece reflects that inevitability. I think a little tweak in places such as
The sundial that should mark days
lies shattered in the shade
of so much piss-stained Saturday-night glass
soon swept away |
|
Just reconsider where words can be cut to tighten it or revise the choices.
Should the first line say clicks time?
|
|
| |
itcametomeinadream at 20:13 on 06 September 2009
Report this post
|
>> Should the first line say clicks time?
It may need revision if you stumbled over the line, but it was intended to be a pseudo-rhyme of "tick tock". I put a hyphen between the words in what may be a vain attempt to avoid it seeming like a typo.
The sundial section may need to make the point differently. It is my yearning for the days when we used less precise measures of time, and a hint what I see as the results of clock-in clock-out by-the-second timekeeping.
In any case, many thanks for the comment
<Added>
Added: I've now reread, and reworded; hopefully I'm getting a bit closer. I struggle sometimes with revising anything, so I very much appreciate the feedback and encouragement :)
| |
leggestesa at 13:57 on 24 September 2009
Report this post
|
A thought provoking and chilling work. I would suggest joining stanzas 6 and 7 for reasons of fluency and meaning.
| |
| |