Login   Sign Up 



 

Fragments of History, Not Lost, Just Forgotten

by di2 

Posted: 02 January 2009
Word Count: 1862
Summary: Historical fragments when put together help us understand a man who walked on this earth many years ago through stories linked to him. How did he behave, what was his claim to fame, where he did he live out his life and why was he so committed. From fragments a personality profile can be built. Here we will build a personality profile from a forgotten memorial at St Andrews Scots Presbyterian Church Rose Bay in Sydney.
Related Works: In the footsteps of Allan Cunningham • Parramatta: a treasure trove of stories • Polypodium dictyopteris (lance fern) • The King`s Botanical Collector Preface • The Tomb of Phillip Parker King • 

Font Size
 


Printable Version
Print Double spaced


In 1911 tradesmen arrived in Kent Street near Sydney's Town Hall. They had instructions from the church leaders to dismantle St Andrew's Scots Presbyterian Church which included the removal of several memorial plaques, stained glass windows, a stone font, the timber rafters and cedar pews. One of the memorial plaques commemorated the life of Allan Cunningham a botanist and explorer. The plaque had been on the walls of the Kent Street church since Allan's life ended in 1839, at the early age of 48. He was completely worn out after years of plant collecting and exploring Australia's wilderness with a tenacious dedication of impressive proportions. He was truly a child of The Enlightenment.

Everything was transported to Rose Bay and installed in the new Scots church a few kilometres from Sydney Harbour's southern headland. This is where The Allan Cunningham Research Team found Allan's plaque in 2008.

W G McMinn mentioned the memorial in his 1970 biography of Allan Cunningham, so we knew that it may still be in existence. A phone call to Reverend Bruce Christian confirmed the existence of the memorial at Rose Bay and he kindly invited us to visit his church and see it for ourselves. We made arrangements for a convenient time to meet and were warmly welcomed by the Reverend and his wife Pat when we arrived.

Rev Christian showed us the interior of the church. There was a wonderful sense of calm in this spiritual place. The walls were red brick, the timbers were a rich deep dark polished brown and all the interior reflected the coloured light pouring through the beautiful stained glass windows. We found Allan's plaque on a side wall and next to it, separated by a simply styled stain glass window, was another memorial plaque commemorating the life of his brother Richard. It seemed "right" that the two brothers were commemorated together. Rare fragments of Australian colonial history, not lost, just forgotten.

These fragments when put together help us understand Allan Cunningham through stories linked to him. His claim to fame is the discovery of the Darling Downs in Queensland and Pandora's Pass and he collected thousands of plant specimens which assisted the global effort of naming the world's flora. This is what he did. What he did is recorded in the history books but the records don't tell us much about who he was. We are interested in how he behaved, what he did, where he did it and why he bothered. It's a little like getting to know someone. From the fragments we are building a personality profile.

As we build a profile of Allan Cunningham, we attempt to measure the significance of the fragments. What makes one piece more important than another? Having some knowledge of the stories linked to a fragment gives them an extra dimension. Several stories linked to the memorial explain the history of Allan Cunningham and provide clues to who he was.

* * *

Allan Cunningham and his brother were born into the age of enlightenment when the study of plants developed into the science of Botany. They were both destined to be plant explorers. Their early botanical experience was given to them by their father who was the Head Gardener at Wimbledon House, the home of the Spencer family. His work very probably brought him into contact with William T Aiton Head of Kew Gardens, Sir Joseph Banks who sailed with James Cook to Australia in 1768 and Robert Brown the famous botanist who sailed with Matthew Flinders in 1801.

Allan was the more famous of the two brothers. He was appointed the Kings Botanical Collector in 1814 on Sir Joseph Banks recommendation. He spent the years 1816 through to 1831 in the Australian colony sending plants back to Kew Gardens in London where his brother Richard, working at Kew as an amanuensis, catalogued his specimens. During his travels Allan spent four years accompanying Phillip Parker King and his crew as they mapped and circumnavigated the coastline of Australia. He later explored inland of the Australia's east coast.

Richard came to Australia in 1833 taking up the position of Colonial Botanist in Sydney. He had been recommended by his brother and Robert Brown. In his first few years he distributed vine cuttings, shrubs, fruit trees and seeds throughout the colony, extending the vinery with the French and Spanish grapes. He died after only three years in the colony so there was not enough time from him to make his mark on history however his violent death, while exploring the Bogan River with Thomas Mitchell, at the hands of startled aboriginals led to a great deal of discomfort for all the people involved. The police investigated and arrested three men who supposedly readily confessed. Two of the accused later escaped and a third, Purimal, was taken to Sydney and incarcerated on Goat Island without trial.

It is possible that Allan returned to Australia to investigate his brothers death. We would like to think so. Allan was a sick man and would have known that he was not strong enough to endure more adventures so there had to be a strong pull to draw him back to the colonly. Like most life changing decisions there are many layers of reason. Putting the decision into context of the times, we should also take into account the importance of Kew Gardens had diminished during the Regency period. Possibly Allan wanted to be "in the field" once again and not stuck in the herbarium sorting out his specimens. For whatever reason, Allan returned to the scene of his past glories encouraged by his good friends Phillip Parker King and Hannibal Macarthur.


* * *

The choice to place Allan's memorial in Reverend John McGarvies Kent Street Church is significant because it hints at a personality trait of religious conservatism.

We know Allan was a member of Reverend John McGarvie's congregation, this is confirmed by his Last Will and Testament where he bequeathed a portion of his assets to the Reverend who was the Scots spiritual leader at the Kent Street church. The second fact is the memorial plaques themselves having been cared for over a long period of time, attached firmly in a prominent place on the walls of the Scots church firstly in Kent Street and then later on the brick walls of the church at Rose Bay.

These facts lead us to believe Allan chose to be a member of Reverend John McGarvie's congregation when he returned to Australia in 1837, preferring a conservative approach to religion in contrast to the other Presbyterian congregation who had chosen to follow the "fire and brimstone" Reverend John Lang.

In the early 19th century the Australian Scots Presbyterian Church split into two congregations as a result of the differences between the two spiritual leaders. Reverend John McGarvie and Reverend John Dunmore Lang. Reverend Lang was a divisive and formidable character where Reverend McGarvie in comparison was more moderate, more reasonable.

It is very unlikely Allan, as described in his obituary In the Sydney Herald in 1839 as "frank, unaffected, firm in principle, with warm feelings tempered by a most kind and benevolent heart, deservedly beloved by his friends" would have chosen as his spiritual leader the Reverend Lang who was continually waging a personal war against many people. His activities, as documented, seem to be vexatious in the extreme.

From this information we are building a profile of a conservative religious man and using that trait as a beginning we can now build an understanding of where his religious practices placed him in the social stratosphere of New South Wales.


* * *

When trying to understand Allan and how he behaved, his religious life is all important because the foundation of the society within which he lived was religion.

Although the British had managed to separate science and exploration from religious dogma, their whole society was based on Christianity. Status in the community was based on which "brand" of Christianity you followed. If you were an Anglican in Britain in the 1800's you had a higher social status than if you where Catholic. This class system was transplanted into the new colony of New South Wales.

It isn't clear how Allan Cunningham identified himself to the New South Wales establishment when he arrived in 1816 however we can assume that when questioned he would have told the story of his lineage. He was descended from the Scottish clan of Cunningham who lived in Renfrewshire Scotland. Born in London in 1791 his home was in Wimbledon in London, near Wimbledon House where his father, a Scot, was the Head Gardener.

We can trace Allan's religious beginnings back to his christening on 4th August 1791 in London's George Yard Chapel. I believe this chapel was a Congregational Church and considered a non-conformist one. The history of the Presbyterian Church is too complicated to discuss here, however, in brief, the Congregational Church was a break away group within the Presbyterian Church. So it was only natural for Allan to join a congregation that he perceived to be close to his religious expectations.

Allan's choice of religion, his Scottish heritage and more importantly his patron Sir Joseph Banks and his connections with Kew Gardens would have given him a gilt edged introduction to people of influence. Strangely, although Allan had these connections, Lachlan Macquarie, the Governor, was not overly generous with his support of the Botanist's needs, possibly because he had his own problems trying to keep down costs. Governor Lachlan Macquarie was a Scot himself from the Isle of Mull. Many of the early colonists were of Scottish extraction and carried with them the seeds of "The Scottish Enlightenment" along with the Presbyterian religion.

Allan did not have much time to socialise when he first arrived in the colony as he was to join John Oxley's expedition along the Lachlan River very soon after arriving. When he returned to Parramatta much the worse for wear after his trek through the wilderness, he set up lodgings. He soon found he was accepted by the "elites" sometimes known as the "exclusives", of the colonial society and would have received many social invitations both in Parramatta and Sydney. As the son of a Head Gardener in London it is not clear what his social status might have been back in the mother country however his access to the "elites" of London society would have been minimal. That all changed once he was in NSW, here he became a person to be respected and accepted at the highest level. Australia gave Allan Cunningham an opportunity to rise to a social status undreamed of back in England.


* * *

As we sat quietly contemplating the wonderful stained glass windows of this peaceful church in its harbourside suburb. Sitting, possibly, in the same seat that Mr Cunningham once sat, singing melodious hymns, we felt a wonderful sense of history. The memorials we came to see served their purpose. A character's profile had emerged from the historical fragments and linked stories leading to a partial understanding of someone who walked on this earth many years before.






Favourite this work Favourite This Author


Comments by other Members



Richard Brown at 11:35 on 20 April 2009  Report this post
Has this recently been re-posted? I see the original 'posting date' is in January...anyway, no great matter; it caught my eye.

Having written a few volumes about 19th century Scottish migration to Canada I have a particular interest in stories of the early settlers (not that I count myself an expert). It ever amazes me how quickly they established themselves, creating stone churches, civic offices and the like.

My only (slight) problem with this elegantly composed piece is its context (which I guess might be made clear from earlier postings which I haven't seen). Is it part of a broader work or a stand-alone? And I note a reference in the introduction to 'we' - implying a team effort to unravel early settler history? Just curious..

Richard.



Richard Brown at 11:31 on 21 April 2009  Report this post
Queries neatly answered! I'm sure it wouldn't take much to convert the piece to a stand-alone article.

I see no reason whatsoever why you shouldn't be a feature writer. Sounds as though the course will be very useful and presumably it will cover essentials such as research and marketing but from the literary point of view I'm sure you have all the requisite skills.

I keep hoping that the WW journalism group will revive. It would be very interesting to see the process from first draft to published piece. And of course, unlike the longer forms of literature, there is a quicker 'turnover'.

If I get a moment I'll have a look at the Cunningham link - thanks for alerting me to it.

Richard.


To post comments you need to become a member. If you are already a member, please log in .