Login   Sign Up 



 

Ring of Conscience

by dadzie 

Posted: 28 June 2007
Word Count: 1190
Summary: Revised Synopsis


Font Size
 


Printable Version
Print Double spaced


Thank you for you advice so far. I have reduced the earlier synopsis considerably, there are areas I feel that I could go to take out the odd line, however, I am not sure that I can reduce the synopsis any further without losing the flow of the story.


RING OF CONSCIENCE – BRIEF SYNOPSIS

Author: Glenn Wilson Genre: Mystery Thriller Words: 80,000

Ring of Conscience is an action thriller following two detectives on the trail of a secret legacy held deep within the vaults of Las Vegas while solving the mystery of a suspicious suicide in England.

Professor Jason Chadwick graduated from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and helped develop the World Wide Web’. He was born in Las Vegas, son of the Donald Chadwick, owner and developer of Casino Security Systems. The Chadwick family move to England after Donald’s retirement but Jason’s parents are killed in a car accident within a year of moving. Jason remains in England and works as a college lecturer while helping major Internet companies like Google and Myspace develop their technologies. In the spring of 2007, Jason commits suicide.

Ring of Conscience opens with Jason’s Personal Assistant, Amy Pearce sitting in a café in London’s Regent Street. Amy suspects that a man she recognises from an incident prior to the professor’s death is stalking her. Amy senses danger and attempts to leave the café via a fire exit door downstairs. She is chased and a waiter is killed trying to protect her. Amy escapes and explains to the police that she believes this man may have had something to do with Jason Chadwick’s death.

Jason’s two sons live in Boston, he did not see them throughout their childhood because his ex-wife refused access but they had recently been in touch. Jason does not trust them, as they only appeared to be after his money. An investigation into his son’s gambling debts reveal a link to a mafia-style crime organisation in Las Vegas. Jason’s father had originally helped to bring the family (The Hammond Organisation) down and they all served time for their part in a multi-million dollar fraud of the casinos. Jason had become suspicious so in his will he leaves a mere hundred thousand dollars for his sons. The remainder of his estate, unbeknown to anybody else has been put into a vault, with a complicated code system – a security feature that had been invented by his father.

Though Amy was not left money in Jason’s will, she was left a gold signet ring with a motif, which looked like the letter M in a semi-quaver. Jason referred to it as his ‘Ring of Conscience’, which was his personal talisman.

Meanwhile Jason’s solicitor is missing. He leaves a note and some money for Amy warning her that she is in danger. Inspectors Thomas Riley and Lucy Bridges from Charing Cross police station are put on the case and uncover in Jason’s will a personal letter to his solicitor whereby he asks him to maintain a website called Melodema.com. The web page is blank with the exception of a password box. Inspector Riley eventually uncovers, a steganographic clue to the password, which opens a new web page detailing a treasure hunt – a series of online puzzles, and clues to enable a person to find his legacy. Jason claimed that to know him would be to understand him and the simple things in life that gave him pleasure.

Thomas and Lucy have been working together for nearly two years and the police force frown upon their growing personal relationship so Thomas decides to search for the Professor’s legacy himself, with Lucy’s help.

Ring of Conscience then follows the two Inspector’s attempts to uncover the clues, which, through investigations using the Internet, explore Jason’s passion for Greek mythology, modern myths and architectural mysteries. During their search however, a gunman holds them hostage under orders from a criminal organisation based in Boston. Amy Pearce is tricked into flying to Boston to meet a friend of Jason Chadwick and is held in a manor, believing that she is helping the FBI. The Inspectors are convinced that Amy is in danger and agree to help the organisation uncover Jason’s legacy in return for Amy’s release.

Jason’s Chadwick’s solicitor meanwhile travels to Las Vegas and speaks with the then mayor, who claims that she was blackmailed at the time by the Hammond organisation and gives him details of the family’s release and relocation to Boston. He flies to Boston and tracks down the manor in his own private investigation. He warns Amy that she is still in danger, but as he attempts to leave the property to inform the police in England, he is caught and killed in the ruckus that follows. The family’s weak link, Nathan Hammond is responsible and their perfectly executed plan is thrown into turmoil. Under increasing pressure the inspectors realise that the clues are leading them towards Las Vegas. The Hammond brothers make a deal with the Inspectors to release Amy while they all fly to Las Vegas to solve the remaining clues together in return for a split of Jason’s legacy.

Action moves to Las Vegas and all is well for the first day, then Stock Hammond, the mastermind of the original Hammond fraud is released from Jail just as news starts to break of a body being found off the coast of Boston, believed to be of the missing solicitor from England. The Inspectors realise that this criminal organisation are thugs and not the well-organised professionals that they believed them to be. They attempt to leave Las Vegas but are spotted and the resulting attempt to escape through the streets of Las Vegas is futile. They lose the chase and are in deep trouble as Stock Hammond is becoming increasingly volatile.

Eventually, Lucy Bridges uncovers the last clue in time, she hopes, to save Thomas’s life. They open the vault in the basement of Excalibur Hotel to find that the money – over ninety million dollars, is missing. Amy Pearce and Jason’s friend Emmanuelle had managed to solve the clues together following an earlier tip off from Lucy. Lucy realises what she has done. The Hammond family flee Las Vegas just as the FBI move in but Thomas Riley is shot and desperately fights for his life as the frantic search continues for the Hammond brothers.

In the end the truth is uncovered about Jason’s death, which ties in with his parent’s fatal accident ten years earlier. The Hammond family are responsible and are eventually caught, but the ringmaster, the brains behind the whole project, is still at large – and still wants his money. That provides a final twist after Amy Pearce shares her windfall with Lucy Bridges and her new husband Thomas Riley, who is making a steady recovery following his shooting in Las Vegas. The Melodema Stone, at the base of the external wall to the Vatican City in Rome is where Amy and her new partner Emmanuelle, Jason’s childhood friend, decide to honour him, the initial clue being the Melodema symbol on Jason’s ‘Ring of Conscience’.






Favourite this work Favourite This Author


Comments by other Members



Cornelia at 10:21 on 28 June 2007  Report this post
I only have time for a couple of comments but hope they will be useful.

The synopsis is still too long, but you can condense the style rather than leave bits out. For instance,

Ring of Conscience is an action thriller following two detectives on the trail of a secret legacy held deep within the vaults of Las Vegas while solving the mystery of a suspicious suicide in England.


could be:

'In this action thriller detectives combine a suicide investigation with the search for a legacy hidden in a Las Vegas vault.'

without losing any essential information or sense of the plot.


I also noticed you used the same start as last time - a paragraph that gives a potted history of Jason Chadwick, then begin the second paragraph :

Ring of Conscience opens


This really should be the first paragraph if it's the start of the story.

Ring of Conscience opens with Jason’s Personal Assistant, Amy Pearce sitting in a café in London’s Regent Street. Amy suspects that a man she recognises from an incident prior to the professor’s death is stalking her. Amy senses danger and attempts to leave the café via a fire exit door downstairs. She is chased and a waiter is killed trying to protect her. Amy escapes and explains to the police that she believes this man may have had something to do with Jason Chadwick’s death.


You don't need to repeat the title (it will appear on the front page of the manuscript and/or at the top pf the synopsis) and you don't need 'opens'


You could cut it to:

When Amy Pearce leaves a cafe to escape a stalker he kills a waiter before disappearing. Claiming to recognise the killer, she tells investigating officers he may be connected with the death of her former employer Jason Chadwick, presumed to have committed suicide.

or something similar.

I'm not sure where you could fit in the details of the opening paragraph - possibly when Amy is telling the story to the police, as an addition to the first paragraph. Something like:

'Although raised in America, after his parents' death in a car accident Jason pursued a successful career as lecturer and computer development consultant, employing Amy as personal assistant.'

Writing this, I recognise how much easier it is to summarise some one else's novel than it is one's own.

Good luck with this.

Sheila



dadzie at 15:01 on 28 June 2007  Report this post
Thank you Sheila. Yes, I understand, I need to approach it differently. My trouble is that Jason is already dead when the book begins, the reader understands more about the man as the book goes on. I found it difficult to keep some sort of chronological order flowing through the synopsis. As for naming the book title several times I was once advised to do this as opposed to using "the book", "the story" or "the novel" (I think the advce came from Hilary Johnston - can't rememember). Is this OK then?

GLENN

Cornelia at 16:34 on 28 June 2007  Report this post
It's a good thing it's not called 'The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night Time', then. It's Ok to use the title at the start. You don't need to use story, etc but just say what happens next. Dee will know better than me. I can't remember whether or not I read Hilary Johnston. Two books I found helpful were Stella Whitelaw's 'How to Write and Sell a Synopsis' and Carole Blake's 'From Pitch to Publication'.

As I understand it, the synopsis should more or less be a summary of what happens in the order it happens with some indication of character reactions and and settings and a precise description of events. No wonder these things are such torture to write.

Sheila

Dee at 09:59 on 01 July 2007  Report this post
Glenn, Cornelia is right. It’s still too long. In fact, I think you could cut it by around half… the problem is, you're too close to it to see that. Believe me, I know how difficult it is to step back and see your synopsis through the eyes of others!

I still don’t know who the main character/s is/are. Is it Amy and the solicitor, or Thomas and Lucy? I agree with Cornelia that you shouldn’t open with the para about Jason – it immediately sets up an expectation that he is the main character… and then suddenly he’s dead.

And there are loads of details you could cut. They are undoubtedly indispensable in the novel, but they don’t add anything to the synopsis. For instance, we don’t really need all that background about Jason's family – the only relevant details in that para is that he was an American living in England, worked in www development, and committed suicide.

Also, there are many repetitions you could cut. For instance: they all fly to Las Vegas followed in the next sentence by Action moves to Las Vegas.

Again:
They attempt to leave Las Vegas but are spotted and the resulting attempt to escape through the streets of Las Vegas is futile. They lose the chase and are in deep trouble as Stock Hammond is becoming increasingly volatile.
attempt to leave – attempt to escape.
the attempt is futile – they lose the chase.
(actually, I don’t understand what this means – are they caught? Why not just say something along the lines of They try to leave, but are caught by Stock Hammond?)

Eventually, Lucy Bridges uncovers the last clue in time, she hopes, to save Thomas’s life.
This comes before Thomas is shot.

Glenn, I know this is fiendishly difficult but, as I said in my comments on your first synopsis, look at each paragraph and isolate the bare essentials. Perhaps I should have said look at each line, each word, and ask what job is it doing for the synopsis.

Good luck,

Dee


dadzie at 11:23 on 01 July 2007  Report this post
Thanks Dee. I understand, maybe instead of an edit I should try to re-write it. In reality the main characters are the detectives it is just that Amy is essential to the plot and throughout the whole book, you learn more about Jason's life as the detectives uncover each clue.

How long should a synopsis actually be? I have been reading the guidelines in the Artist and Writers yearbook, which advises two pages. I thought around one thousand words would be my target, should it be aound five hundred?

GLENN

Dee at 18:42 on 05 July 2007  Report this post
Glenn, psychologically it’s preferable to keep the synopsis to one page single spaced, but it needs to be as concise as possible.

There are loads of words you can cut out of this. For instance:
just as news starts to break = as news breaks
a body being found off the coast of Boston = a body being found
believed to be of the missing solicitor from England = believed to be the missing solicitor.

No one finds this easy, so you're not alone.

Dee


NMott at 12:21 on 06 July 2007  Report this post
Hi, Glenn.
By my estimate, a thousand words would be about two and a half pages if you space out the paragraphs as you have done here, so aim for 500.

As Dee says, there is still a lot of superfluous detail here: eg,
Inspectors Thomas Riley and Lucy Bridges from Charing Cross police station
It is not necessary to say Charing Cross Police Station.

The main problem I found with the synopsis is it did not make clear who were the main characters. Is it Jason, Amy, Lucy or Thomas? It switches between characters and the nuts and bolts of the plot.

If the novel is largely told from the inspectors POVs then I think you should follow them through the plot. Feed some of the backstory about Jason into the plot line, and towards the end say what Lucy and Thomas got out of the whole experience.

The Agents will be looking for character development as well as plot structure. Considering he's dead, I found Jason to be the most well rounded character, where as Amy was the least well described, and I did not get a clear image of Lucy and Thomas's developing relationship. I also did not get a clear idea of why Thomas had taken the case in the first place, with Lucy seemingly following along in his wake. And how did Lucy come to know Amy?


- NaomiM

dadzie at 14:41 on 06 July 2007  Report this post
Thanks again. Yes, I have been working on a seriously scaled down version today (so far 740 words). The main characters are the detectives but, there are three POV's covered through the book: The Hammond Brothers (the bad guys) are after Jason's legacy (money), The Detectives (The Good guys!) are also after Jason's legacy as well as solving the crimes and protecting Amy - Who is the third POV). All three POV's converge towards the end of the book, in the race for it.

Thus the problem with the synopsis - the more it shortens the less it makes sense. The underlining theme throughout the book though is the relationship between Thomas and Lucy - do you feel that should be the focus of the synopsis? You are right in that I have neglected the importance of this.

I much appreciate all your comments btw. It has allowed me to seriously focus on the project and every step I make, I feel that more confident (and excited).

NMott at 18:15 on 06 July 2007  Report this post
The underlining theme throughout the book though is the relationship between Thomas and Lucy - do you feel that should be the focus of the synopsis?


I did get that impression - after I had sat down and thought about it for a while - so my answer would be yes.
You might have to cut Amy out of the synopsis, or only refer to her as 'with help they...' Also I think you should play up the Hammond Brothers (probably at the expense of Jason), as without this the synopsis lacks tension. Also (bearing in mind I have not re-read it, so this is based on first impressions - an Agent is unlikely to read it through twice either), it is unclear exactly what they are all searching for - you mention the hidden vault with the rest of the money in it, but are they following clues as to where the vault is, or to the code that will open it?
There is a bit of an information dump in the last paragraph about the ring, but I think this should be emphasised and explained earlier.


- NaomiM


- NaomiM

giles at 14:04 on 10 July 2007  Report this post
Glenn,

First off I think you have an original and intriguing story here with a satisfying resolution. My feeling after reading it a couple of times is that you're at about 20,000 feet with another 15,000 feet to climb so we can get the main juicy thrust here - the tie-up between Jason, his parents and the Hammond family. One thing you could do is pull a few mystery thriller books off the shelf, flip them over and see how they're sold on the back. Get us salivating, so to speak.

One other minor thing - you mention the use of codes - might be fun to build in biometrics. I say this because I make money on the side doing consulting and one of my clients manufactures biometric equipment - fingerprint scanners and the like. In Japan some banks are using vascular scanners which scan the inside of your fingers, also picking up the pulse - prevents anyone from spoofing the system by using dead fingers. There are all sorts of novel developments in iris and face recognition etc. This might be a diversion for you but I thought it worth mentioning just in case.

Hope this helps.

All the best,

Giles

Jubbly at 11:55 on 13 July 2007  Report this post
Hi Dadzie,

I know you're on holiday but I'll strike while the iron's hot. You know this is too long and I know you're working on a shorter version but I still think anything over 600 words is still too long. I always try and do two synopses for everything a 600 worder and a 40 worder. Believe me it can be done and is so helpful for you the writer, you really get to the crux of what you're trying to say. I agree, it does sound like an intriguing thriller and very filmic too, in fact it almost reads like the breakdown of a film script treatment but this is a novel after all. If it is to be told through the POVs of three different characters then tell us that upfront. Who are they? What are they seeing? What is their objective? Dee is right, these are fiendishly difficult to get right but they are possible, in an ideal world you should be able to sum up your story in one sentence if asked as you would if you'd just finished reading a book and someone asked you what it was about. Less is more. Please post again. I like the idea of the website but I couldn't access it, might be a problem my end.

Best of luck

Jubbly


To post comments you need to become a member. If you are already a member, please log in .