Login   Sign Up 



 

Metamorphism the Fifth Cycle

by seanfarragher 

Posted: 29 January 2006
Word Count: 781
Summary: Prompt for poem .... was beauty or lost beauty
Related Works: From the Book of Byzantium -- Parts 5 and 6 -- By Laurie Fallon, A Virtual Person Dead 9/11/01 • From the Book of Byzantium -- Parts 1 and 2 • From the Book of Byzantium -- Parts 3 and 4 • 

Font Size
 


Printable Version
Print Double spaced


Metamorphism the Fifth Cycle
By Sean Farragher

The earth grew its own heart.
Great lizards walk the Amazon.
Photographs of infinite beasts
shift shoulders, fall, freeze with
cold boulders made into shells.

The history of the earth is grand.
There is nothing more to discern
except what cannot be known
when the next storm rides
with Poseidon out of the Irish glade
over the cobble stones into fame.

The Fifth cycle repeats when
the earth melts as it did four
times four, such a discontinuity
can only reveal as human sacrifice
set to the top of Mayan pyramids.

We not only pray to fire, storm,
death, corn and suicide. We laugh when
we dream that peaceful end.

Come with me lads and lasses
to an old fashioned Irish wake.

Trapped by the humor of it all
we steal the imagery to welcome
another fall from grace. Dear
mother humping serpent let's worship
with our tongues and spits
and all those darker moves
that sets you on the game.
Do not refuse the spoils of war.


2.
Ireland ran away. It passed out
the historical tree. It was ground
into the drifting mud of New Zealand
huts bound to the beach. It was
Wooden taverns strung as jewels
in Boston and New York for music
to rip away at backbone
replaced with every curse
as Jesus walked in Tuam
Streets carrying his eyes and
hands in a bag. He was ready
to make beautiful what was old,
but the sad sack invisible
to the guardians of the pub.
They barred the door to sandals
stained brilliant green by his
pilgrimage from Zion to Erin.

These awful beasts revived
canyons driven with blood,
as they genuflect to worship
that first beast with razor teeth.

We have had the past and now
that new cycle will open its books.

The fifth Universe, created from song
drifted down the future highway
as I rubbed hands on a lass, --

I will alter time in this confused
travelogue. Nothing was what it seemed.

The lass speaks:

“Beauty is temporary,” she said.
“I will grow old with mountains
driven through my loins.

The great serpent shifts
thigh from cocks to breast –

She cannot hear her testimony.
There was no sound left alive.

The green door to the pub
opens for them. He squeezes
her ass, and runs to the bar
while she sits calm in the Loo
racing the days left behind
into future tense, as her pubis
trembles when Mass bells ring.
When will she be stroked by belief?
Frozen to the old earth melted
into streams of imaginary lovers
who cannot find her heart at all.

Is that the life we know being
born again when nothing heals?

Am I so crude when I touch
my vulva to clean it, I shift
and cannot escape the pull
of fingers or the effort dug
into the mighty fortress
of our God, so help me Mary?

We do piss away our memories.
How does that past drip down
on our arms and into the crowd?
Let the rabble hear the truth.

Outside, the lads mingle
with old men drunk in corners.

“What truth is that a dark man
says,” his eyes closed by fishing
too long on the Irish China Sea.

Terra, born of God’s boredom
draws its ancient words from broken
sticks, cheery pits and gory tales
drawn in blood from every woman
to keep man alive and our sexy
God, drunk on mother’s milk,
races up the beanstalk with Jack
to find that heaven has been replaced
by row houses in Alphabet city
and Vegas strippers with cups of coins
driven like a great beast born
out of misery and into a peculiar
paradise where pain and pleasure
have the same reward,-- so help me
God I am heartily sorry for having
offended thee and I detest the loss of
privilege and the mercy of Christ the Jew.

Great beasts will be born again.
This becomes the fifth cycle of the earth
Ireland will be more beautiful, and
the women and men more handsome
than the newts and frogs and puppy dog
tails beating their meat on a plastic street.

Ireland's long gone; Liffey and Shannon
held back by a lonely Yeats.
Mother warmed the rashers for breakfast.
My Irish lady dressed in French silk stood high
watching the descent of men--
beasts and serpents dressed in Roman robes.
Nothing we do will change the history of Adam,
Eve and the fall. Apples grow out of grace and back again.
No one remembers Dublin, Cork and Belfast
famous names left behind to hide their Furies from the Black and Tans.



XXXX first draft 1/29/06







Favourite this work Favourite This Author


Comments by other Members



DJC at 13:53 on 30 January 2006  Report this post
Sean - how about having a go at the seminar stimulus?

DJC at 19:09 on 30 January 2006  Report this post
Sean - this still feels like you're masking the truth with rather dense imagery. I don't feel, through reading this poem, that I get to know you or understand anything about you, which is what confessional poetry should be about. Are you being honest with yourself? I'm not so sure.

Darren

<Added>

I'll give an example, as I don't think I'm being very clear.

We cannot walk in London.
New York was never born.


Who is the 'we'? Does it refer to you, or mankind in general? And why can't we walk in London? And why wasn't New York born? I'm just really struggling to find out where the confession, where the truth is in this.

Sorry for going on, but it's bothering me that I can't get hold of this.

seanfarragher at 19:27 on 30 January 2006  Report this post
I was having fun with the exercise. There are many confessional poems in my archives at writewords. But I will take on your revised challenge. It is about history, america and the consequence of the lies we hear every day on the news. Truth for the poet is not to propagandize but in an oblique way suggest through the imagination another way. Read my Byzantium prose poems in the archives if you wish to read confession, as I was abused as a child, and I don't hold back from speaking my mind, confronting my parents (now both dead).... But I will do as you ask,... I liked the poem I started today. It is hardly finished. I hope you enjoyed my site. If you want the old sean read the poems under poetry sampler. Thanks for your effort,and I love hearing how I bother people, for it makes me think about what i am doing right or wrong, and it pushes me forward.

cheers

DJC at 19:37 on 30 January 2006  Report this post
Come on, stop evading the question. What does the quote I picked out mean? I guess I understand about the London bit, because of the bombs etc. But New York? Confess!

<Added>

Also, it's not the content that bothers me, it's the way you express it.

seanfarragher at 19:49 on 30 January 2006  Report this post
In some alternate reality London does not exist, and New York, child of the Dutch and English (after 1664) cannot exist without the river thames, which also does not exist, and for me, all history and geology is accident with no divine intervention, but subject to "changing laws" as physics may seem a constant, but Newton gave way to non-euclildan geometry which gave way to Heisenberg and Einstein and Neils Bohr, and of course Cambridge that most beautiful place, a place I truly wish I had had the opportunity to call my University (when I was 20) moves itself out of the circle. We cannot confess as we do not percieve accurately, and what is there (contrary to the positivists) is not there, for space, dark matter and unknown, unknow are what determine the matrix (no allusion to the movie) that we become.
Science, history, mathematics, physics, sex, danger, war, madness, and our immortality (which may be temporary as a species) are changing..... as we know more, we know less, and of course the laws, which are not consistent, change so we can understand at one point higher what we mean when we confess truth.

i am not being snooty, snobby or arrogant in saying this. It is what i believe, and I also love that you challenge me, and i want more to challenge myself not only to write better crafted poems, but poems that unify and expand knowledge and experience without any predetermined ideology, program or agenda. I do not write for a general audience. I write for those who want to take up the challenge and say stop the bullshit Sean, or at least tolerate my madness.

thanks


Sean

<Added>

Tomorrow I will post the poem here that I wrote. I will also post part B, a true confessional poem as an addendum.

DJC at 19:56 on 30 January 2006  Report this post
Your madness I can tolerate, Sean - but I want you to express it so I feel it as well. Does this make sense? At the moment, I don't feel much, other than mild irritation at your evading the truth you're obviously desperately looking for. Aren't we all, though.

We cannot confess as we do not percieve accurately


Are we talking about perception of external reality, or our own inner world? If the former, then that sort of Cartesian argument is a bit old hat. If the latter, then surely we have to trust ourselves to a certain extent, to confess knowing that what we confess has to be in some way meditated through the filters of our consciousness - otherwise our entire existence is in some way diminished.

Just reread your posting above. Blimey I wish I could get into your head for a minute or so. I might understand it all a bit better then.



<Added>

for meditated, read mediated - although a bit of meditation might help...

<Added>

sorry, one more thing while I'm on one:

In some alternate reality London does not exist, and New York,


How about writing about the ones we know about, then??

Xenny at 23:57 on 30 January 2006  Report this post
Hello Sean

Below I've written some thoughts I've had about your poems, trying to explain what's stopped me from having much to say. I've done this because I'd like to get more into your poetry, but having read what I've written I realise I might just sound presumptive, too abstract, and weird. I'm sorry - I had to try, as I'd like to appreciate your work better (and get you more into the group(!) as like Elsie I'm very curious to hear what you have to say about others')

I think I've only commented once or twice on your poems before. I got put off a little and I'll try and explain why without muddling myself too much. I think initially I read your poems and thought, okay there's a lot I don't get, and I'd prefer more simplicity, but there's incredible images and I sense a reason behind even (especially) the more complex associations which are less/not clear to me. And I also felt I understood some of the need to leave uncertainty or ambiguity, because it can be more accurate than actually trying to root out the truth and speak it in plain words (because maybe it doesn't exist as a neat thread like that, and maybe there's a fear of it being misconstrued or breaking down). And I wondered if there was some hiding going on (did Darren mention hiding?), which I also felt I understood.

But then I started to think perhaps I was wrong. And that what I saw as a striving was really an arrogant certainty (so sorry!). I mean I started to think maybe you felt it possible to make things discrete. That for you there was no issue of the interdependence of words (I want to mention Derrida's word 'dissemination', as it is a good one, but I don't like relying on a 'name' to sound like I'm making a good point!). That you felt it possible to encompass/frame/some-word-I-don't-know things perfectly.

And whilst if that was the case I wouldn't like to denounce it as 'wrong', it would make it very hard for me to start talking about your poems. Like my comments would have no place.

By the way, I don't mean that I think in order to write poetry you need to consider the above. No way! I guess what I'm saying is that I used to strive for some completeness/descreetness in my writing until I saw it lead to 'nothingness', and now I try not to think too much. But if someone seems to go along those lines and feel they've found that descreetness, I think NO.

Having read what you posted above to Darren (In some alternate reality...) I thought maybe I'd got the wrong idea (the second time round I mean).

This is terrible - I've said nothing about this poem and maybe nothing of any sense at all. I'm going to read your poem again. If I can find a way of commenting on it without taking up a whole page I will come back tommorrow and make a nice succinct post.

---
p.s. I really hope I've not offended you with anything I've said - I've had a lot of admiration for what I've read of yours, and your depth of knowledge scares me!

p.p.s. If you could relax things occasionally just a very small bit it would be nice.

paul53 [for I am he] at 13:48 on 31 January 2006  Report this post
Hi Sean,
On "This is not Washington DC":
This reminded me of something I read recently: along the lines that the Darwnians got it wrong; that we humans are not part of nature, but have either evolved so far from it we feel estranged, or else have been placed WITHIN nature and are always at odds with it - trying to cover it or else "improve" it. There was a reference to turning over a stone and seeing the creatures and damp darkness underneath; that cities presented cut, smoothed and polished stones cleaned of their origin: and that the provinces were the places where "the stones have two sides".
But a replica of some other
domain that barely succeeds
as impression or pantomime.
Do we possess a racial memory of intangible places, then try to reproduce them by aping Ancient Rome or Athens?
Did you like it when you lived in Ireland? My mother hailed from Armagh, but I haven't been there since 1971.
Paul


To post comments you need to become a member. If you are already a member, please log in .